BI4OAE

Emergency Communications Frequency Planning: Where to Meet When It Matters

2026-10-18 · Emergency Communications

Why frequency planning is the first lesson

In normal operating, frequency is disposable — this spot is crowded, move to the next. Disaster does not allow that.

Three reasons. The person who needs help and the person who can help may never have met; the only thing that can bring them together is a frequency agreed in advance. Second, “let’s try another channel” in the middle of chaos usually means lost contact — both sides move to different places and never find each other again. Third, repeaters and the power grid can both fail, so you need a degradation path for when the infrastructure underneath you disappears.

The core work of emergency communications is therefore to fix the frequencies and procedures in advance, write them on a card, and tape it to the equipment.

Design the layers by infrastructure availability

A complete plan is layered by what infrastructure still works:

Each layer has to be thought through beforehand, because the moment you need to degrade is usually the moment you are least able to think.

Simplex: the frequencies worth memorizing

Two simplex frequencies appear in almost every national and regional emergency scheme:

Around the primary, plans usually list a few adjacent working frequencies (for example 146.460, 146.475 and 146.490 MHz on 2 m) so traffic can spread out when the calling channel congests.

These are international conventions, not legal assignments everywhere. In China, the frequency table published by your provincial radio management authority, or the one agreed with your local emergency group, always outranks any generic advice. If a local emergency frequency table exists publicly, that table wins.

Besides voice channels, the card should carry data frequencies. Published regional tables typically list, in addition to repeater primaries and the national simplex channels:

The value of these entries shows up when voice nets are saturated: moving form-type content onto a data path takes real load off the voice network.

HF: which band for which distance

HF planning cannot stop at “which frequency” — it has to say “which band for which distance”. A widely cited mapping:

NVIS — near vertical incidence skywave — means high-angle propagation aimed almost straight up, precisely to cover short distances. Normal DX work chases low angles; emergency work very often needs the opposite, because the typical requirement is “get this message to a command post a few hundred kilometers away.”

Public emergency tables show the same layering in practice: provincial nets on 40 m by day and 80 m at night, plus fixed watch frequencies on 40 m and 20 m.

Geomagnetic storms are the variable here. NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center grades storms on a G scale: at G1 to G2, HF propagation fades mainly at higher latitudes; at G3 and above, HF radio can become intermittent across much wider areas. Operationally, when a strong storm is in progress, I drop short-range NVIS traffic to 60 m — more robust than 40 m — and keep a VHF/UHF fallback for genuinely local coordination inside about 50 km.

Beyond voice: digital modes worth a line on the card

Their shared value: when voice is unintelligible, they still deliver exact text. The most common failure in emergency traffic is a number or address copied by ear — digital modes route around that entirely.

Operating principles matter more than frequencies

Frequency planning is only the skeleton. What keeps order on the air is discipline:

The one thing you can do today

You do not need to wait for a drill. Take a sheet of paper and write down:

Then laminate it, or tape it inside the lid of the equipment box. On the day you actually need it, you will not want to be recalling any of these numbers from memory.

References

Chinese-language archive of this site: /zh/