BI4OAE

How to Choose Coaxial Feed Line for Ham Radio: Loss, Connectors, and Weatherproofing

2026-10-18 · Equipment & Gear

The counterintuitive part

Most beginners judge feed line by thickness and price. Neither is wrong exactly, but neither is the point.

The point is total loss. Keep it in the 1–2 dB range for the whole run and stop worrying.

Why loss and not power handling? Because at 100 W on HF, power handling is essentially never the problem — even RG-58 handles hundreds of watts there. What decides how strong your signal is, is how much of it the line converts to heat on the way to the antenna. The question is never “is this cable tough enough” but “at what frequency, over what distance, how much do I lose.”

Numbers worth memorizing

These are typical matched-loss figures in dB per 100 feet (about 30 m). Real values vary by manufacturer and installation, but the magnitudes are what matter:

Published tables agree on the ordering even where individual numbers differ; ARRL’s QST measurements, for example, put RG-213 at about 0.8 dB per 100 ft at 14.15 MHz versus roughly 1.9 dB for RG-58A.

From that table, the selection rules write themselves:

One more law hides in that table: loss rises with frequency. The same cable can lose a dozen times more at 430 MHz than at 7 MHz. “This cable works great on shortwave” tells you nothing about 70 cm.

The nastiest trap: low SWR does not mean a good antenna

This is the part worth tattooing on the bench.

An antenna that measures 2.0:1 SWR at the feedpoint can read 1.3:1 at the radio. That is not measurement error — it is feed line loss flattering your meter. Reflected power has to travel back down the line to be measured, and the longer and lossier the line, the less of it arrives. The loss is lying to your SWR meter.

The consequences are real. You can have a badly mismatched antenna and never know, because the reading at the shack looks fine — while a meaningful fraction of your power is being dissipated in the cable. The fix is to measure at the antenna end. A compact vector network analyzer such as a NanoVNA lets you set the calibration reference at the feedpoint and see the true impedance and SWR. That single habit saves more stations than any cable upgrade.

Related arithmetic: mismatch amplifies loss. At 3:1 SWR, multiply the matched loss by roughly 1.5 to 2. At 10:1, the additional loss can exceed 3 dB — which is half your transmit power gone, radiated as heat instead of signal.

Connectors

Three connector families cover almost everything in amateur service:

Connector quality matters more than people expect. A poorly installed PL-259 costs about 0.1 dB at HF and more at VHF/UHF — and at UHF, two bad PL-259s can easily outweigh the savings from thinner cable. Install a sloppy connector at each end and you have spent the entire upgrade budget on nothing.

Weatherproofing: two layers, every time

Every outdoor connector gets sealed. This is the most common slow failure in the whole station.

Once water wicks into the braid, loss climbs day by day, and you see nothing abnormal until SWR suddenly jumps or the cable dies outright. The standard treatment is two layers:

  1. Self-amalgamating tape wound tightly around the connector body, stretched as you wrap so it fuses to itself.
  2. A UV-resistant outer layer over that — plain electrical tape cracks and peels within months outdoors.

Two easy-to-miss points:

The mistakes that keep happening

A one-minute selection method

Ask three questions:

  1. What is the longest run, in meters?
  2. What is the highest frequency I will use, in MHz?
  3. Will any of this run be exposed outdoors?

Pick the smallest cable that keeps total loss inside the 1–2 dB budget, seal every outdoor joint with both tape layers, and measure true SWR at the antenna end at least once. Do those three things and your feed line will never be the weak link again.


References

Chinese-language archive of this site: /zh/